Discussion paper submissions

Independent Review of the Ports and Maritime Administration Act 1995 and the Port Botany Landside Improvement Strategy

View submissions

Submissions received for Independent Review of the Ports and Maritime Administration Act 1995 and the Port Botany Landside Improvement Strategy – Discussion Paper.

Verbal feedback was also received and recorded.

Submissions received

NumberNameOrganisation / Individual / Peak body or advisory group / Union
1Alliance Transport Pty Ltd - *in confidence content omittedOrganisation
2Boating Industry Association (PDF, 267.91 KB)Peak body or advisory group
3Container Transport Alliance Australia (CTAA) (PDF, 284.92 KB)Peak body or advisory group
4Container Transport Interested Parties - *in confidence content omittedPeak body or advisory group
5DP World - *in confidence content omittedOrganisation
6Freight Trade Alliance (PDF, 1.35 MB)Peak body or advisory group
7H Y Transport Pty Ltd (PDF, 360.9 KB)Organisation
8Hutchinson Ports (PDF, 1.02 MB)Organisation
9Michael Jarvin (PDF, 974.75 KB)Individual
10J O’Donnell Customs (PDF, 160.97 KB)Organisation
11Tony Latella - *in confidence content omittedIndividual
12Lopez Bros Transport Pty Ltd (PDF, 1.23 MB)Organisation
13Maritime Advisory Council (PDF, 1.21 MB)Peak body or advisory group
14Maritime Union of Australia (PDF, 721.94 KB)Union
15NHVR (PDF, 1.38 MB) - late submissionGovernment
16NSW Ports (PDF, 306.29 KB)Organisation
17Patrick Terminals - *in confidence content omittedOrganisation
18Port of Newcastle (PDF, 249.79 KB)Organisation
19Price and Speed Containers (PDF, 181.15 KB)Organisation
20Road Freight NSW & International Forwarders & Customer Brokers Association of Australia Ltd (PDF, 192.71 KB)Peak body or advisory group
21RL (PDF, 456.47 KB)Individual
22Shipping Australia Ltd - *in confidence content omittedPeak body or advisory group
23Svitzer Australia Pty Ltd (PDF, 353.76 KB)Organisation
24Janice Thurgar (PDF, 1.38 MB)Individual
25Philip Vine (PDF, 903.87 KB)Individual
26Greg Winstanley (PDF, 63.87 KB)Individual

 

* Submissions marked with an asterisk have omitted ‘in confidence’ content – part or all of the submission is not online.

# Hash denotes some attachments are not available online. Contact the project team for access if necessary.

% Percent symbol denotes scanned image PDF’s which are not readable by some screen readers. For help read our accessibility statement.